AC1.1 score system - Revision history

X-Ray Dog at 17:55, 22 April 2012

2012-04-22T17:55:49Z

Viper: /* Scoring */

2011-05-25T05:11:04Z

‎Scoring

Viper: /* Scoring */

2011-05-25T05:10:54Z

‎Scoring

Viper at 04:29, 24 May 2011

2011-05-24T04:29:34Z

Viper: /* Implementation */

2011-05-24T04:15:52Z

‎Implementation

Viper: Created page with '==Implementation== The score system implemented in the 1.1 release of AssaultCube is designed to encourage team play. It acts as a replacement for the ratio display from pas…'

2011-05-24T04:12:20Z

Created page with '==Implementation== The score system implemented in the 1.1 release of AssaultCube is designed to encourage team play. It acts as a replacement for the ratio display from pas…'

New page

==Implementation==

The score system implemented in the 1.1 release of [[AssaultCube]] is designed to encourage team play. It acts as a replacement for the ratio display from past versions, which rewarded spammers, campers, and in general, very selfish players. The idea here is that the "good" player (and therefore the highest scoring player) carries his team by playing the objective, protecting his teammates, and eliminating his enemies.

==Controversy==

As of the 1.1 release, some factions of the community have greatly advocated the return of ratio to the game, and have demanded sweeping changes in the score system. The issue here mainly falls with the way certain types of actions award points.

For example, one disputed area is voicecom covering. If flagrunner A uses the "Cover me!" voicecom, and his teammate player B responds with "Yes," any covering kills that player makes are worth 5 extra points as long as the flag is held.

In response to some criticism, as well as the need to expand and clarify the system, the developers, especially Brahma, are in the process of re-working some aspects of it.

==Scoring==

Table to come soon.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 25 May 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Table to come soon.		Table to come soon.

−	[http://forum.cubers.net/thread-464.html \| AC1.1 score system (Brahma's post)]	+	[http://forum.cubers.net/thread-464.html AC1.1 score system (Brahma's post)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 25 May 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Table to come soon.		Table to come soon.

−	~~<references/> <ref name=AC1.1 scoring system>{{cite web \|url=~~http://forum.cubers.net/thread-464.html \|~~title=~~AC1.1 score system ~~\|publisher=~~Brahma~~, AC Developer}}</ref> <references/>~~	+	[http://forum.cubers.net/thread-464.html \| AC1.1 score system (Brahma's post)]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 24 May 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Table to come soon.		Table to come soon.
		+
		+	<references/> <ref name=AC1.1 scoring system>{{cite web \|url=http://forum.cubers.net/thread-464.html \|title=AC1.1 score system \|publisher=Brahma, AC Developer}}</ref> <references/>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Implementation==
-The score system implemented in the 1.1 release of [http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AssaultCube AssaultCube] is designed to encourage team play. It acts as a replacement for the ratio display from past versions, which rewarded spammers, campers, and in general, very selfish players. The idea here is that the "good" player (and therefore the highest scoring player) carries his team by playing the objective, protecting his teammates, and eliminating his enemies.
+The score system implemented in the 1.1 release of [http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AssaultCube AssaultCube] is designed to encourage team play. It acts as a replacement for the ratio display from past versions, which rewarded spammers, [http://wiki.cubers.net/action/view/Camper campers], and in general, very selfish players. The idea here is that the "good" player (and therefore the highest scoring player) carries his team by playing the objective, protecting his teammates, and eliminating his enemies.
 ==Controversy==
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 As of the 1.1 release, some factions of the community have greatly advocated the return of ratio to the game, and have demanded sweeping changes in the score system. The issue here mainly falls with the way certain types of actions award points.
-For example, one disputed area is voicecom covering. If flagrunner A uses the "Cover me!" voicecom, and his teammate player B responds with "Yes," any covering kills that player makes are worth 5 extra points as long as the flag is held.
+For example, one disputed area is [[voicecom]] covering. If flagrunner A uses the "Cover me!" voicecom, and his teammate player B responds with "Yes," any covering kills that player makes are worth 5 extra points as long as the flag is held.
 In response to some criticism, as well as the need to expand and clarify the system, the developers, especially Brahma, are in the process of re-working some aspects of it.